Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second Life Community Standards"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Shall mature be cleard up so we know it's much harder in SL than RL?) |
(response) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If art like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_de_Milo Venus de Milo], is mature according to this standards I think that this have to be made more clear. So problems like the once surrounding the Burning Man exhibition don't happens again. Personally i don't think it's a great idea to move the PG rating that far away from RL in second life. All residents are supposed to be mature. What the limits are is extremely important when considering getting land. As my stuff could get deleted and the land worthless if i do wrong for a project. | If art like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_de_Milo Venus de Milo], is mature according to this standards I think that this have to be made more clear. So problems like the once surrounding the Burning Man exhibition don't happens again. Personally i don't think it's a great idea to move the PG rating that far away from RL in second life. All residents are supposed to be mature. What the limits are is extremely important when considering getting land. As my stuff could get deleted and the land worthless if i do wrong for a project. | ||
--[[User:Nadine Nozaki|Nadine Nozaki]] 23:58, 30 August 2007 (PDT) | --[[User:Nadine Nozaki|Nadine Nozaki]] 23:58, 30 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
:The problem with clearly defining what is mature content is forgetting something. Although there is the fall-back rule of "broadly offensive content", forgetting something that should be classed as mature content gives asshats a loophole. | |||
: See [http://forum.slbirthday.info/topic/sl5b-draft-policy the draft policy for SL5B] for my take on what constitutes '''mature content'''. | |||
:[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 20:22, 2 September 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:22, 2 September 2007
If art like Venus de Milo, is mature according to this standards I think that this have to be made more clear. So problems like the once surrounding the Burning Man exhibition don't happens again. Personally i don't think it's a great idea to move the PG rating that far away from RL in second life. All residents are supposed to be mature. What the limits are is extremely important when considering getting land. As my stuff could get deleted and the land worthless if i do wrong for a project. --Nadine Nozaki 23:58, 30 August 2007 (PDT)
- The problem with clearly defining what is mature content is forgetting something. Although there is the fall-back rule of "broadly offensive content", forgetting something that should be classed as mature content gives asshats a loophole.
- See the draft policy for SL5B for my take on what constitutes mature content.
- SignpostMarv Martin 20:22, 2 September 2007 (PDT)