Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adult content keywords"
m |
(deletion of the article was wrong) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|10:48, 27 April 2009}} | Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.{{unsigned|DanielRavenNest Noe|10:48, 27 April 2009}} | ||
== Deletion == | |||
It was wrong to delete this list. It didn't violate the [[Editing Guidelines]] (only point I could imagine would be the PG paragraph tho I'd consider a list of keywords still PG as documantation rather than obscenity). Furthermore, it will prevent the contributors to contribute more content to ''any'' article because of the fear of irrecoverable removal. It only causes drama. | |||
The reason given at [http://forums.secondlife.com/showpost.php?p=2407818&postcount=5987 thread 2407818 post 5987] isn't really a reason to remove this. False information can be fixed. If we'd decide to remove every article that contains partitially false or incomplete information, we wouldn't have much of a wiki anymore. | |||
-- [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 16:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:16, 28 April 2009
Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 10:48, 27 April 2009 by DanielRavenNest Noe
Deletion
It was wrong to delete this list. It didn't violate the Editing Guidelines (only point I could imagine would be the PG paragraph tho I'd consider a list of keywords still PG as documantation rather than obscenity). Furthermore, it will prevent the contributors to contribute more content to any article because of the fear of irrecoverable removal. It only causes drama.
The reason given at thread 2407818 post 5987 isn't really a reason to remove this. False information can be fixed. If we'd decide to remove every article that contains partitially false or incomplete information, we wouldn't have much of a wiki anymore.
