Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parcel media"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Peter Newell (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Good question Peter. The new media framework doesn't really rely on QuickTime - rather, QuickTime is used to implement one of the classes of media. There is a different implementation for these media types on the Linux platform (GStreamer). The new Web based media type is (currently) implemented using LLMozLib which is fully cross platform. My intention is that any new media types in the future will be released on all 3 supported platforms simultaneously -- Callum Linden | Good question Peter. The new media framework doesn't really rely on QuickTime - rather, QuickTime is used to implement one of the classes of media. There is a different implementation for these media types on the Linux platform (GStreamer). The new Web based media type is (currently) implemented using LLMozLib which is fully cross platform. My intention is that any new media types in the future will be released on all 3 supported platforms simultaneously -- Callum Linden | ||
The number one use I see with this is in dynamic text and form input, for all clients. -Peter Newell |
Revision as of 15:57, 2 October 2007
Since this is relying so heavily on the quicktime libs, does that mean that there will be no linux implementation for this media? - Peter Newell
Good question Peter. The new media framework doesn't really rely on QuickTime - rather, QuickTime is used to implement one of the classes of media. There is a different implementation for these media types on the Linux platform (GStreamer). The new Web based media type is (currently) implemented using LLMozLib which is fully cross platform. My intention is that any new media types in the future will be released on all 3 supported platforms simultaneously -- Callum Linden
The number one use I see with this is in dynamic text and form input, for all clients. -Peter Newell