Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nexii Malthus/Geometric"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I couldn't figure it out either. ~_~ --'''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 10:54, 20 August 2008 (PDT) | :I couldn't figure it out either. ~_~ --'''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 10:54, 20 August 2008 (PDT) | ||
::Well, shall we bug the lindens then? I could see lots of uses. I always wondered why such a thing was always missing on wikis. This is why I think that generally wikipedia doesn't like having in-depth information on articles because they cause too much clutter. A system that allows in-depth info on wish for the reader would be the answer to this. --[[User:Nexii Malthus|Nexii Malthus]] 21:25, 29 August 2008 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:25, 29 August 2008
This is absolutely crazy, I have tried countless methods so far for creating collapsibles. From JS to CSS.
Also why can't I create a custom monobook.css for this page like the mediawiki formatting help tells me that I can?
And why are the CSS pseudo-classes stripped out? I really could have done it if I had the :hover pseudo class available to change the visbility of the script code. --Nexii Malthus 07:21, 20 August 2008 (PDT)
- Well, shall we bug the lindens then? I could see lots of uses. I always wondered why such a thing was always missing on wikis. This is why I think that generally wikipedia doesn't like having in-depth information on articles because they cause too much clutter. A system that allows in-depth info on wish for the reader would be the answer to this. --Nexii Malthus 21:25, 29 August 2008 (PDT)