Template talk:LSL Header
Revision as of 14:37, 8 October 2013 by Strife Onizuka (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Layout = == Style == I think a review of the header is in order. I'm thinking some javascript dropdown menus (which will require harassing LL to add that sort of thing to the…")
Layout
Style
I think a review of the header is in order. I'm thinking some javascript dropdown menus (which will require harassing LL to add that sort of thing to the wiki). We could stuff more stuff into it then. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 14:37, 8 October 2013 (PDT)
Ordering
The order of the values doesn't seem entirely right. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 14:37, 8 October 2013 (PDT)
New Item Suggestions
LSL_Alternate_Editors
I believe it could use a link to LSL_Alternate_Editors. Whatcha think? -- Kireji Haiku 10:16, 8 October 2013 (PDT)
- My gut says no. The question that comes to the top of my mind as the most important question is this: "How often is will a user visit the page?" I can sort of see a user, after reading a random LSL article suddenly going "Ahha! You know what would make this better is if I switched to an Alternative Editor. Now how do I go about finding one that supports LSL?" but I cannot see them going the next day "vim sucks, now how do I find out about Alternative Editors?" There isn't much in the way of demand for repeat use. Everything that is currently in the header is a category each which links to a plethora of articles. They each represent a different fundamental view of the content that lives in the LSL Portal (with the exception of the Categorized Library, which really needs a the above #Style remake to resolve).
- Considering the how low we would be setting the bar if we accepted AE, we would have trouble fending off LSL Protocol and the like. One of the design goals is that the header doesn't take up a huge amount of screen space. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 14:37, 8 October 2013 (PDT)