Template talk:LSL Function

TODO

• Add self & mode limiting for the lslwiki link.
  • Move the link to a subtemplate so future changes to the wording don't require rebuilding all articles.
• Add inline style to parameter table: "margin-bottom:0.5em;" and remove footnote br.
• Wrap Deepnotes sections in divs to isolate them ~_~
• Add preview mode via Template:LSL Generic/preview(?)
• fix func-id for pre-release documentation & LSL_Functions/ID sort.
• Make right side description info floater text a tad smaller.
• Common Mistakes section?
• Disable category inclusion for requests
• Get/Set Caveat separation for sub-templates #var:caveats_set, #var:caveats_get, will aid in using the templates for constants.
• Change History section to a table?

LSLwiki.net

I had a discussion with Gally today and we came to the following conclusion:
Since we're not able to copy content from lslwiki.net and vice versa - because of licensing problems - we might benefit from linking related articles of both wikis. So users can easily switch from one Wiki to the other and find the information most helpful for them. There shouldn't be a rivalry between these two documentation projects. They should benefit from each other. Therefor, we're adding a link to the related LSLwiki.net article to this template. I hope it's ok.
Something else on the same topic: It seems to be(come) quite popular in Wiki culture to double-license the own contributions, in order to make them easier to share. Wikis of interest for us:

• The Second Life Wiki (of course): Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
• The LSLwiki.net: an implicit copyright model
• The SecondLife Wikia: GNU Free Documentation License

Please consider to double-license your contributions to this (or other) Wikis in order to make them easier to share, by writing a statemanet about double licensing on your userpage. You can also use one of Marv's templates: Template:Re-license contributions as well as Template:License.
This is just a suggestion of course. Just do it, in case you want to do it.
Greetz, Lynch ^{(talk|contribs)} 20:14, 9 September 2008 (PDT)

I would have liked a little discussion on the wiki before the template change. Now someone is going to have to go back and tweak the change so it only applies to articles that don't set "self" or use mode=request or mode=user. I'll put it on the ToDo list (which is there to give people an opportunity to comment on ideas). I've been kinda busy but I'll get to it and a couple others this week. -- Strife ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:03, 9 September 2008 (PDT)

Sorry, I didn't realize that userfunctions were using this template as well (x_x). I just tested it in a sandbox to ensure I wasn't braking more. But you're right, a discussion here would have been appropriate nevertheless. Sorry again for that... And thanks for fixing!

Lynch ^{(talk|contribs)} 11:58, 10 September 2008 (PDT)