Talk:LlList2Rot
Revision as of 19:22, 13 July 2008 by Chaz Longstaff (talk | contribs) (New page: In the function definition at the top, there is this text: If the type of the element at index in src is not a rotation then ZERO_ROTATION is returned. Here is a workaround: (rotation)llL...)
In the function definition at the top, there is this text:
If the type of the element at index in src is not a rotation then ZERO_ROTATION is returned. Here is a workaround: (rotation)llList2String(src, index);
"Here is a workaround" seems out of place; it seems fine in Caveats, where it's also mentioned.
However, it's not apparent how it should be removed from the function definition area (if I'm correct, that is, that it is out of place up there.) Chaz Longstaff 20:22, 13 July 2008 (PDT)Chaz Longstaff. 13 July 2008