Version control repository

Linden Lab doesn't yet provide live access to a central revision control repository for the viewer source code. However, this is being considered.

Request for proposals

Below is a request for proposals for public Subversion repository hosting.

Requirements:

High capacity, high availability anonymous read access, with corresponding SLA
Direct user management by Linden Lab (self-service add/remove/disable accounts)
Self-service password changing for all individual account holders
Minimum 40GB capacity
Ability to completely delete rogue revisions within one business day
Nightly backups
Real-time read access to all raw Subversion data files via ssh/sftp or other secure

Additional desirable features:

Integration with outside authentication system, either Kerberos or custom XML-RPC based system.
- If relying on external authentication, user management still needed to provide authorization management

Proposals being accepted through February 9, 2007.

Please address responses to Rob Lanphier at Linden Lab

Subversion - default choice, and the obvious "safe" choice. Pros: familiar to us, used by a lot of people Cons: very centralized model; need to give people access to facilitate effective collaboration
Mercurial - bleeding edge choice. Pros: Distributed model makes it easier for anyone to distribute patchsets off of the main codebase without needing a central host. Much easier to maintain a private branch. Cons: more complicated model, less familiar, much newer system
svk - a decentralized revision control system built on top of svn.
Externally managed repository, via 3rd party site, such as sourceforge.net, Berlios.de, or similar.