Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlSetPayPrice"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fred Gandt (talk | contribs) (→Jira issue: Thanx Zai) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Hiya. Thanx for explaining Zai. I may actually get the hang of the templates one day. For now I am still trying to master LSL. See ya in-world! -- '''[[User:Fred_Gandt|Fred Gandt]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Fred_Gandt|talk]]|[[User:Fred_Gandt/Scripts|scripts]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fred_Gandt|contribs]])</small></sup> 15:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | ::Hiya. Thanx for explaining Zai. I may actually get the hang of the templates one day. For now I am still trying to master LSL. See ya in-world! -- '''[[User:Fred_Gandt|Fred Gandt]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Fred_Gandt|talk]]|[[User:Fred_Gandt/Scripts|scripts]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fred_Gandt|contribs]])</small></sup> 15:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
: We keep the dead issues listed on the page for two reasons: | |||
:# So there is a record of the bug having existed and it's resolution is documented. If the information were stripped from the article, it would be harder for the user to confirm the status of the bug and the functionality. | |||
:# If the bug comes back, it's easier for a reader of the article to reopen the correct jira. It reduces the chances of a repost/duplicate bug report. | |||
:I do worry though that folks won't look for/in the "Issues" subsection when they don't find it in the "Important Issues" subsection. Maybe a link should be added to the important issues subsection (when the two do not match)? -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 15:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:33, 10 February 2010
Jira issue
It seems that VWR-8744 is fixed. Should it be crossed out or removed from here? -- Fred Gandt (talk|scripts|contribs) 00:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Heyas :)
- The info about the bug is stored at Template:Issues/VWR-8744. These bug templates use Template:Issue, which provides parameters to adjust the proper status. I changed the issue accordingly, which displays it striked through in the article. Guess it's good to leave it there for future reference.
- --
(talk|contribs) 06:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hiya. Thanx for explaining Zai. I may actually get the hang of the templates one day. For now I am still trying to master LSL. See ya in-world! -- Fred Gandt (talk|scripts|contribs) 15:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- We keep the dead issues listed on the page for two reasons:
- So there is a record of the bug having existed and it's resolution is documented. If the information were stripped from the article, it would be harder for the user to confirm the status of the bug and the functionality.
- If the bug comes back, it's easier for a reader of the article to reopen the correct jira. It reduces the chances of a repost/duplicate bug report.
- I do worry though that folks won't look for/in the "Issues" subsection when they don't find it in the "Important Issues" subsection. Maybe a link should be added to the important issues subsection (when the two do not match)? -- Strife (talk|contribs) 15:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)