Difference between revisions of "Talk:Viewer 2 Help"
Fred Gandt (talk | contribs) (→Viewer2 Rocks!: Well at least I thought so at first.) |
Fred Gandt (talk | contribs) m (Added "unsigned" template) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page should be editable, just like any other page. | This page should be editable, just like any other page. {{unsigned | Lee_Ponzu}} | ||
== Viewer2 Rocks! == | == Viewer2 Rocks! == |
Latest revision as of 16:08, 2 September 2010
This page should be editable, just like any other page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lee_Ponzu
Viewer2 Rocks!
LL have been busy huh? It shows. Viewer2 is very smooth, classy and intelligent. Congratulations to all those LL devs involved with putting it together. -- Fred Gandt (talk|scripts|contribs) 21:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- I just wanted to add a note regarding my initial impressions of V2 and my subsequent rethinking.
- Although V2 looks smart and seems slick, after only a couple of hours I found myself harassed and bamboozled. I tried again and again to get to grips with it but, to date have not managed to configure it in such a way that I can work with it without running into occasional frustrations. Even if those frustrations are only occasional they make simple tasks unbearably tiresome. I hope that in time V2 will become more like V1.23 (which I currently use happily) but with all the added goodies and some of the shiny black class and style that is/was so impressive. I intend no disrespect of Linden Labs or those who've worked so hard to code V2. I only seek to exclaim my more sober opinion regarding V2. It has many qualities but, it also has many floors. I find V1.23.5 basically floor-less. The math is simple. Roll on V3!! -- Fred Gandt (talk|contribs) 01:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- I just wanted to add a note regarding my initial impressions of V2 and my subsequent rethinking.
KB Seal misuse
This is a definite misuse of KB Seal. The KB Seal is for user pages that have been included in the KB, not for Linden pages to be flagged as being in the KB. The Seal clearly states "Although Linden Lab can't guarantee its accuracy, as part of the Knowledge Base it must meet high quality standards, and designated Reviewers must approve any changes. You can edit this article and make it better!" The problem is this article has been protected, only Administrators, Lindens and Translators can edit it. Either put the article under review or remove the seal. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 03:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Good point! Backstory: it was gonna go in the LLO namespace but I believe it'll benefit from Resi contributions. Some weeks later, it's had "gel" time to stabilize. Now available for review! - on 2010-03-15 @ 11:37 AM Pacific
- <.< I admit it, I was trolling. I don't know why I was but I was. I was out looking for some minor injustice to squash, I just wish it hadn't been yours. I'm sorry. I can't think of anything to make it better. I'll ask Zai to add detection of this situation to her bot, maybe she can find a nicer way of bringing attention to the problem. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 22:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- DETECTION ACTIVATED.
- DRAMA DETECTED.
- ATTEMPTING TO FIX DRAMA.
- INSERTING ANTI-DRAMA UNICODE: ♥ ☺ ☮ ★ ☂
- --WIKI SCRIBE (✉|✍) 00:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)