Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlGiveInventoryList"
Tali Rosca (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
>> # If inventory cannot be copied then an error is shouted on DEBUG_CHANNEL. | |||
This sucks the big one compared to the elegant, clear, precise English that was in LSL wiki: | |||
llGiveInventoryList can only give items which the object owner has copy permission on. | |||
But one, of course, doesn't dare change it lest Madame sweep in her broom to set it back to the more obscure and exclusive. [[User:Chaz Longstaff|Chaz Longstaff]] 01:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Considering there were several edits of the sample script, what should the sample script be? Should we have multiple? The current script gives away it's contents. It used to say it was an unpacker in it's description, but I corrected that. If we want an unpacker, then the sample should be different (and check to make sure the toucher is the owner). If we want a script that checks the flags to ensure they are the correct permission, that seems like a good sample for [[llGetInventoryPermMask]]. [[User:Kunnis Basiat|Kunnis Basiat]] 15:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | Considering there were several edits of the sample script, what should the sample script be? Should we have multiple? The current script gives away it's contents. It used to say it was an unpacker in it's description, but I corrected that. If we want an unpacker, then the sample should be different (and check to make sure the toucher is the owner). If we want a script that checks the flags to ensure they are the correct permission, that seems like a good sample for [[llGetInventoryPermMask]]. [[User:Kunnis Basiat|Kunnis Basiat]] 15:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:38, 19 October 2010
>> # If inventory cannot be copied then an error is shouted on DEBUG_CHANNEL.
This sucks the big one compared to the elegant, clear, precise English that was in LSL wiki:
llGiveInventoryList can only give items which the object owner has copy permission on.
But one, of course, doesn't dare change it lest Madame sweep in her broom to set it back to the more obscure and exclusive. Chaz Longstaff 01:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Considering there were several edits of the sample script, what should the sample script be? Should we have multiple? The current script gives away it's contents. It used to say it was an unpacker in it's description, but I corrected that. If we want an unpacker, then the sample should be different (and check to make sure the toucher is the owner). If we want a script that checks the flags to ensure they are the correct permission, that seems like a good sample for llGetInventoryPermMask. Kunnis Basiat 15:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Issues
Issue Link At Bottom Leads To
llGetInventoryKey returns NULL_KEY when referencing a notecard that's empty
Adi 16:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Forgot To Sign
Template Was Wrong, 868 Template Lead To 4050 And Yay I Learned About Templates Today Adi 17:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, when creating those I just copy and paste from one of the others... and I guess I forget. I've been meaning to make it auto-detect the issue handle so it doesn't have to be inserted (also thinking about doing this with the LSL Constants template, where I sometimes make the same mistake). -- Strife (talk|contribs) 13:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
"Group deeded objects cannot use this function, the error "Group owned objects cannot give inventory." is shouted on DEBUG_CHANNEL" This does not seem to be correct. Testing, a deeded object happily hands out inventory lists to avatars (whether they are in the group or not). Tali Rosca 20:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)