Difference between revisions of "User:SignpostMarv Martin/Archive/Implementing new features"
m (→Pseudo-Voice) |
|||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
=== Pseudo-Voice === | === Pseudo-Voice === | ||
[[User:Lee Ponzu|Lee Ponzu]] | [[User:Lee Ponzu|Lee Ponzu]] 13:49, 12 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Most of our computers have local, client-side voice synthesis. Yes, it sounds like a robot, but it is still voice. Real voice, ala Skype, is fine. But just like we use Avatars to | Most of our computers have local, client-side voice synthesis. Yes, it sounds like a robot, but it is still voice. Real voice, ala Skype, is fine. But just like we use Avatars to hide our real selves, we need a way to hide our real voice. | ||
A huge advantage is that we could get voice without adding to the bandwidth. The text is coming anyway. | A huge advantage is that we could get voice without adding to the bandwidth. The text is coming anyway. | ||
The simplest idea is that one could mark one or more Avatars, and their Chat would be rendered as voice, as well. | *The simplest idea is that one could mark one or more Avatars, and their Chat would be rendered as voice, as well. | ||
Slightly fancier---One could set the voice characteristics (male, female, pitch, etc.) for each other Avatar. | *Slightly fancier---One could set the voice characteristics (male, female, pitch, etc.) for each other Avatar. | ||
Fanciest---Each user can set ones voice characteristics using Appearance, and those setings would be used on each local client. | *Fanciest---Each user can set ones voice characteristics using Appearance, and those setings would be used on each local client. | ||
==== Barriers to Implementation ==== | ==== Barriers to Implementation ==== |
Revision as of 13:49, 12 January 2007
Of course, a really valuable way to contribute is to add a new feature. Try to work with the community and with Linden Lab in planning the feature before running off and implementing new things. Though we appreciate your hard work, we can't accept every new feature, since maintaining new features comes with a cost. Try thinking of ways to use APIs to make plugins, or perhaps propose new APIs to make the viewer more extensible, before adding new things to the core viewer.
Ideas for new Features
If you have an idea for a new feature you'd like to see in the client, consider adding it to this list.
Discussion on each topic can be found in this article's Talk page
Alternate Rendering Engines
- older hardware support, etc...
- (Open Source 3D Engine)
Barriers to Implementation
Better Sound Support
Falk Bergman (by way of #opensl on IRC)
- Preload status
- playback control, etc...
- Quote: llKelly: eightltr: yes, that idea has been suggested in the past. (L$1 per 1sec audio) I think we would rather improve the methods of linking to externally hosted sounds.
- MIDI Support - maybe with some nice clientside Wavetables
- MOD, XM, ect. Support
Barriers to Implementation
Removing Texture Loading
Falk Bergman (by way of #opensl on IRC)
- so SL can run on less powerful Systems (say the N800/N770)
Barriers to Implementation
Patching it so that llLoadURL opens the F1 Help Browser
Falk Bergman (by way of #opensl on IRC)
- Adding keyword replacement in llLoadURL, Streaming media support, and other external links
- For instance, to provide an icecast stream with a agent UUID, http://'''agentkey''':apassword@icecast.somehost.com:8000 as a parcel URL
- To provide an external website with a SL User Name, http://www.somesite.com/somephp.php?query=stuff&slname=''agentname''&action=buy&deliveryto=''agentkey''
Barriers to Implementation
- Unless the LSL2 VM starts supporting optional parameters, you risk breaking thousands of scripts
- Workaround: Prefix urls with ubrowser:, e.g. ubrowser:http://example.com, which will result in the dialog box indicating that the url will open inside the client.
- Alternative Workaround: Clientside rewriting only, for connecting to media URLs
Adding a Avatar Local Stream Channel
Falk Bergman (by way of #opensl on IRC)
- that has a Range of X Meters around an Avatar
- This would be used for Local Audio Streaming
- Or Local VoIP chat
- Teamspeak...
Barriers to Implementation
Peer to Peer Voice over IP using above idea, improved
- Capible clients advertise themselves via below CTCP-style protocol
- Clients use multicast packets to broadcast to a list of addresses the server manages of clients in range.
- In effect, this would give each avatar two unidirectional shoutcast-style stream impliments, or one bidirectional impliment.
Barriers to Implementation
Pseudo-Voice
Lee Ponzu 13:49, 12 January 2007 (PST)
Most of our computers have local, client-side voice synthesis. Yes, it sounds like a robot, but it is still voice. Real voice, ala Skype, is fine. But just like we use Avatars to hide our real selves, we need a way to hide our real voice.
A huge advantage is that we could get voice without adding to the bandwidth. The text is coming anyway.
- The simplest idea is that one could mark one or more Avatars, and their Chat would be rendered as voice, as well.
- Slightly fancier---One could set the voice characteristics (male, female, pitch, etc.) for each other Avatar.
- Fanciest---Each user can set ones voice characteristics using Appearance, and those setings would be used on each local client.
Barriers to Implementation
I can't think of any. Sounds petty easy to me.
More efficient local cache
Barriers to Implementation
CTCP protocol layered on IM system
Barriers to Implementation
Establishing a circuit between two clients will probably require server side assistance, since circuits are UDP based, and most clients will be behind NAT's and firewalls. CTCP will require a clientside listening socket either implemented via RFC 3489 or some sort of UPnP code using a TCP direct connection.
Command Line Interface Improvements
- for changing preferences sending an IM, teleporting, etc
- for example: "/set drawdist 96", "/set sound off", "/tp ahern", or "/im kex godel hello"
- would need an escape system which doesn't conflict with script command gestures (or a reserved words like how /me is)
- Or better yet, the Ctrl-G Gesture management window could be improved to allow this, and even allow rebinding /commands
Barriers to Implementation
- Implementing an escape system which doesn't conflict with script command gestures (or a reserved words like how /me is)
More sophisticated IM features
- muting/filtering/autoresponse options
- mute or do not alert on IMs by started by a group, agent, or group-agent
- Autoreply to IMs received while (Away)
- Sidebar Userlist of Active Users who are currently participating in a Group IM Session.
- When a user says something, they're added. When a user leaves the session, they're removed from the list.
- More control over filtering specific objects/textures/sounds/agents/etc
Barriers to Implementation
- Anything that requires server-side modification SignpostMarv Martin 11:11, 11 January 2007 (PST)
Shortcut/Link/Alias function in Inventory
- Add a "link" ("alias", "shortcut") facility to the inventory, that would not break Permissions. For instance, I have one nice set of prim dress shoes that are no-copy, and four tuxedos. I cannot make complete separate outfits, because I have only one copy of the shoes. However, using a "link", I could create an outfit folder with the tux and a link to the no-copy shoes. Still means I would only have the one set, but it would make changing clothes much much easier. Buckaroo Mu 09:23, 9 January 2007 (PST)
Potential Barriers to Implementation
DirectX3D Hardware Acceleration
- A DirectX3D-driven version of the viewer, allowing those with ATi or Intel hardware accelerated cards to take advantage of the processing power. The system could allow selection as a preference of OpenGL or DirectX3D, as many Windows-only games currently do. Conditional build statements would keep the option from appearing in the non-DirectX3D capable builds. Buckaroo Mu 09:28, 9 January 2007 (PST)
Barriers to Implementation
GPGPU Support
- A method of offloading some of the graphics processing to the GPU might help increase framerate. Buckaroo Mu 09:37, 9 January 2007 (PST)
Barriers to Implementation
Multiple Monitor Support
- Support for detachable sub-windows, allowing the inventory, chat history, IM, etc. windows to be moved to a second monitor (if available). This is a very highly-desired feature (by those that have dual-monitor systems). Buckaroo Mu 09:37, 9 January 2007 (PST)
- This could potentially be done using an external program, if SL had some way of exposing this data in a crossplatform way. (Does NT support named pipes?) Some libsecondlife projects such as SLeek are already exposing this. Kamilion Schnook 20:39 Jan 9 2007
Barriers to Implementation
Embedded scripting language for client-side plugins
Heather Goodliffe, Yumi Murakami
- Make the client more powerful and plugable
- Embed a scripting language, such as LUA or Python, within Second Life to enable client plug-ins to be written in a modular fashion. Client plugins would be distributed via Second Life itself; hopefully LL would eventually agree to create a new object type for these, but for testing purposes notecards would probably suffice.
Known Barriers to Implementation
Nude patch
- Modify the client to not render any avatar clothes or attachments.
Barriers to Implementation
Steps to how Linden Lab could 'disable' a 'nude patch'
- Run a check on clothing textures including alpha information
- Check for alpha information around the genitalia, refuse upload if check returns positive
- Composite clothing textures server-side when avatars are:
- In PG regions
- Viewable from PG regions
A 'nude patch' would function by:
- somehow submitting full alpha textures on all clothes no matter what was worn (prevented by LL as described above)
- ignoring what the server says regarding skins
- Could use procedurally generated textures based on avatar shape, and primitar type to prevent 'Attack of the (nude) Clones'
- SignpostMarv Martin 01:02, 11 January 2007 (PST)
- I don't think a nude patch could work anyway - the skin and clothing textures are combined on the wearer's client, then the combined texture is uploaded to the server as the single texture that appears on the avatar. That's why "rebaking" your textures on your client affects how other people see you. You could possibly just apply the same skin to everyone but you might just as well leave everyone unrezzed then ;) - Yumi Murakami
Two Tier Search
Yumi Murakami
- Server performs a possibly less-effective search which is database efficient, such as the current fulltext search. The client then performs its own search, refining the results. Should allow extra flexibility and take some load off LL's database.
Barriers to Implementation
User Interface Improvements
Yumi Murakami
- General improvements to the user interface. Maybe move to a seperate article: User Interface Improvements
Barriers to Implementation
See Also
Linden Lab is considering offering bounties for especially desirable features in the viewer.