Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Operators"
(new section in regards of last article change) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:NP. It's just an almost automatted behaviour of mine when I spot unsingned comments ^_^ [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 01:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | :NP. It's just an almost automatted behaviour of mine when I spot unsingned comments ^_^ [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 01:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
== One/Two == | |||
I don't understand [https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=LSL_Operators&curid=3817&diff=339462&oldid=293743 this correction]. I'd even consider it beeing wrong. Can anyone explain? [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 11:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:31, 29 April 2009
Operator Precedence
I've added a note about the precedence of || over &&, and changed their positions in the table; it would be good if someone could test the rest to see if there are any other gotchas (or if, perhaps, a knowledgeable Linden could pop in here and straighten in out). I did this one as I ran into it. Siann Beck 05:38, 6 October 2007 (PDT)
bit shifting
I've been having problems right shifting negative integers and have created a function for Right Shift to bypass the >> operator and shift the signed bit. --Dedric Mauriac 02:10, 3 February 2008 (PST)
Layout Changes?
Not fond of the groupings here. needs categorical groupings like Logical/comparison, math/assigment, bitwise, and maybe even grouping(to include lists) casts(possibly linked to the type pages) and concatenation.
Also Should we modify the layout to be more like other categories (types as an example) with separate pages for each operator (or perhaps just groups of operators)? There is a lot of information that I'd like to include on what types the operators work on, and differences between the returns when working on different types, and putting it all on one page is going to get messy. Thoughts?—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 01:16, 29 April 2009 by Void Singer
PS whoops sorry about the unsigned comment, got busy between windows.
- NP. It's just an almost automatted behaviour of mine when I spot unsingned comments ^_^ Lynch (talk|contribs) 01:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
One/Two
I don't understand this correction. I'd even consider it beeing wrong. Can anyone explain? Lynch (talk|contribs) 11:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)