Difference between revisions of "LSL Protocol/Restrained Life Relay/gender"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(set gender)
(more comments, some old ones a bit reworded, navigation box)
Line 1: Line 1:
=== !gender ===
{{Restrained Life Relay Specs TOC}}
 
== !gender ==


''Not yet implemented''
''Not yet implemented''
Line 13: Line 15:
; Discussion :
; Discussion :


: Please explain how !gender differs from !vision in implementing more than a strict RLV gateway which you commented by "I 100% agree with Sharie: a relay should NEVER implement such commands as !vision. I spoke with Marine about it and she too agrees that !vision and !visionclear have nothing to do in a relay. I personally will always refuse to implement such features in my own relay(s)." --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 05:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
: Please explain how !gender differs from the optional !vision extension. On [[LSL_Protocol/Restrained_Life_Relay/vision|!vision]] you wrote that you "agree 100%" that a relay should only be "providing gated access to viewer RLV commands". --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 16:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


: Can this be done with @getdebug_gender and @setdebug_gender? --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 05:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
: Can this be done with @getdebug_avatarsex and @setdebug_avatarsex? --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 16:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


: If the protocol is extended to read the gender, there should be a way to set it, too. The relay can of course refuse that, but it should be specified in the protocol right from the beginning, so that we don't need a later hacky extension. --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 05:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
: If the protocol is extended to read the gender, there should be a way to set it, too. The relay can of course refuse that, but it should be specified in the protocol right from the beginning, so that we don't need a later hacky extension. --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 05:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
: "ko" should be mentioned as valid response. --[[User:Maike Short|Maike Short]] 16:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:04, 8 April 2009

Restrained Love Relay

!gender

Not yet implemented

Description
meta command to pass a the gender of the relay wearer to the device using the relay.
Effect
When receiving this meta-command, the relay must send a special acknowledgment that contains the gender of the wearer (to be set via a menu, or a chat command, or a notecard). The valid genders are: "neuter", "male", "female", "hermaphrodite".
Motivation
There is currently no easy way to know the gender of the avatars interacting with a device, short of asking their player via a menu. It would be easier if the players could give the gender of their avatar to their relay once and for all, then have the devices automatically adapt their actions and/or emotes to it.

Henri Beauchamp 00:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Discussion
Please explain how !gender differs from the optional !vision extension. On !vision you wrote that you "agree 100%" that a relay should only be "providing gated access to viewer RLV commands". --Maike Short 16:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Can this be done with @getdebug_avatarsex and @setdebug_avatarsex? --Maike Short 16:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
If the protocol is extended to read the gender, there should be a way to set it, too. The relay can of course refuse that, but it should be specified in the protocol right from the beginning, so that we don't need a later hacky extension. --Maike Short 05:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
"ko" should be mentioned as valid response. --Maike Short 16:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.secondlife.com/w/index.php?title=LSL_Protocol/Restrained_Life_Relay/gender&oldid=309352"